Cellar

the AI-powered counterparty due diligence platform

Every firm runs due diligence, and answers it. Both cost weeks and thousands.CELLAR automates both sides, so you spend hours instead of weeks.What you get back is time for real Governance and your clients.

Built for CSSF 22/806 · CSSF 18/698 · DORA

Watch the videos

Due diligence is a costly process

Each financial services company (e.g. a fund manager, a depositary, an administrator) must vet the others, and answer their reviews in return.

Manual Fragmented Time-consuming

But mandatory.

How do you speed up the process while delivering a positive client experience?

Every due diligence processed and stored in your CELLAR

Automated Centralised Fast

Two videos, four minutes

From market utility…

1 min 34

…to the platform that runs it.

2 min 28
What Cellar does

The whole DD lifecycle in one platform

1
Design the questionnaire
2
Secure outreach
3
Review & risk-score
4
Formal DD report
5
Ongoing monitoring & renewal
6
Governance pack
7
Compare

Recipients need no account and no password.

They answer through a single secure link, then everything routes back to you automatically, in one audit trail.

One platform, both roles

Run a due diligence, or respond to one

Under CSSF 22/806 every firm in the fund-servicing chain is due-diligenced by its counterparties and runs due diligence on its own delegates. Cellar serves both directions, from one login.

Run a due diligence

Design your questionnaires, send secure links to your delegates, review and four-dimension risk-score their answers, then keep a board-ready DD register, ongoing-monitoring trail and renewal reminders. The full supervisor workflow.

Respond to a due diligence

Pre-fill your own DDQ once, attach your documents and keep a reusable, versioned DD pack. When a counterparty asks, send a secure, time-limited link to a branded report, then monitor exactly which counterparty opened and downloaded what, and when.

Consistent, comparable, auditable

Four-dimension risk scoring, every DD

Every review ends with the same numeric risk profile, whatever questionnaire it ran on, auto-scored to an overall rating that drives the renewal date.

O
Operational
L
Legal / Regulatory
R
Reputational
F
Financial
LOW
3 years
MEDIUM
2 years
HIGH
1 year
Why it works

Built for users

A clean and structured workflow. Focused on quality deliverables. Addressing regulations.

1

CSSF 22/806

The spine. Outsourcing arrangements for every CSSF-supervised entity, ICT and non-ICT. The regime that puts every party in the chain in scope.

2

CSSF 18/698

The fund-manager overlay. Governs both AIFMs and UCITS management companies, with risk-based renewal at 3 / 2 / 1 years.

3

DORA

The ICT-third-party overlay. Digital operational resilience for all financial entities, applied to technology providers across the chain.

Onboard clients faster

Time
32h
In-house
4h
Cellar
−88%
less time per DD

Lower acquisition cost

Cost
100
In-house
22
Cellar
−78%
lower cost
MethodologyManual: cost = time spent × market salary (incl. social charges). With Cellar: cost = time spent × salary (incl. social charges) + platform fee (incl. VAT).Salary basis · 32h vs 4h per DD · blended across client cases · illustrative

Strengthen your compliance

Real outputs from the platform, on anonymised data. Viewing only, no download.

More Automation · More Judgment · A Clean Audit Trail
Pricing

Pricing shared on request

The full tier and options pricing is shared with prospects after an introductory call. Enter the access code you were given to unlock it.

See it on your own delegate chain.

A 30-minute walkthrough, mapped to the parties you actually diligence.

Book your demo